MCP vs Custom API Integration
MCP standardizes how tools are exposed to AI clients. Custom integrations can be simpler for one app—but may be harder to reuse and govern across clients.
Quick Verdict
Choose MCP if...
- You want a standardized tool interface across multiple AI clients
- You need reusable tooling and consistent schemas
- Governance, logging, and RBAC are requirements
- You expect to add more tools over time
- You want a clean boundary between AI clients and business APIs
Choose custom integration if...
- You’re integrating AI into a single existing app quickly
- Tooling is minimal and tightly coupled to one workflow
- You prefer direct API calls with a smaller surface area
- You don’t need multi-client portability yet
- You want a short path to MVP before standardizing
Side-by-Side Comparison
Decision Checklist
Ask yourself these questions to guide your decision:
Tradeoffs & Gotchas
Our Recommendation
Frequently Asked Questions
Can we start with custom integration and migrate to MCP?
Does MCP replace our backend APIs?
Is MCP required for tool calling?
How do you secure tool actions?
Recommended next steps
Related services
Related Comparisons
n8n vs Zapier
Zapier is faster to start for simple automations. n8n is better when you need control, complex logic, and reliable workflows at scale.
RAG vs Fine-tuning
RAG is best when answers must stay grounded in changing knowledge. Fine-tuning is best for consistent style or repeated tasks when knowledge doesn’t change often.
OpenAI vs Claude
Both providers can power production AI products. The right choice depends on your workflows, tooling needs, reliability requirements, and governance constraints.
Need help deciding?
Every project is different. Let us analyze your specific requirements and recommend the best approach.