Technology
Token Development
Launch tokens safely with a clear spec, test coverage, and a deployment plan—designed for real users and long-term maintainability.
Best For
Ideal use cases
Projects launching tokens
Utility token implementations
NFT collections
Token distribution systems
Applications requiring custom token logic
What We Build
Projects we deliver
ERC-20 token contracts
ERC-721 NFT contracts
ERC-1155 multi-token contracts
Token distribution contracts
Vesting and lockup contracts
Airdrop systems
Token staking contracts
Governance token systems
Ecosystem
Compatible tools & integrations
Seamless Integrations
Works with your existing stack
Use Cases
Recommended use cases
Token launches and ICOs
NFT collections
Utility token implementations
Reward and loyalty programs
Governance token systems
Delivery
How we deliver
We develop token contracts using OpenZeppelin's standard implementations
Implement proper security measures and access controls
Set up token distribution and vesting mechanisms
Create token metadata and documentation
Deploy to testnet for testing before mainnet
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
ERC-20 is for fungible tokens (cryptocurrencies). ERC-721 is for unique tokens (NFTs). ERC-1155 supports both fungible and non-fungible tokens in one contract. We choose based on your use case.
We implement distribution contracts with vesting, lockup periods, and airdrop mechanisms. We can distribute tokens to multiple addresses, implement time-based releases, and handle different distribution scenarios.
We focus on technical implementation. For token economics, tokenomics design, and regulatory compliance, we recommend working with specialized consultants and legal advisors.
AI
Add AI on top of this stack
Two common AI services that pair well with this technology, plus the evidence-first buyer sprint.
Related
Explore related technologies
Regional
Delivery considerations for your region
Data and risk discovery (Canada)
Privacy, security, residency, and regulatory requirements differ by workflow. We document the applicable data flows, roles, retention needs, and control owners before recommending an architecture.
The resulting proposal lists the controls and evidence that are actually in scope. It is not a generic compliance, certification, or legal-assurance promise.
- Map data sources, destinations, roles, and sensitive fields
- Record access, retention, logging, and deletion requirements
- Identify required security or procurement evidence before contracting
- Use an NDA or DPA only when the parties mutually execute it
Working model (Canada)
Exact live-overlap hours, response expectations, meeting windows, and escalation contacts are confirmed in the proposal for each engagement.
Written decisions, scoped milestones, and asynchronous updates reduce unnecessary meetings without implying an unagreed service level.
- Proposal-specific overlap and meeting windows
- Named owners for decisions and blockers
- Written scope, assumptions, and change decisions
- Milestone cadence agreed before kickoff
Commercial setup (Canada)
The contracting entity, proposal currency, invoicing cadence, payment terms, intellectual-property terms, and required vendor documents are agreed before work begins.
The Opportunity Sprint can establish the evidence needed to scope a production pilot; it does not pre-commit either party to a rollout.
- Contracting entity and currency confirmed in writing
- Milestones and acceptance criteria defined in the proposal
- Vendor-document requirements identified before signature
- Scope changes require an explicit written decision
Delivery controls (Canada)
Testing, observability, release, security, and handover controls are selected for the actual system risk rather than promised as a generic bundle.
Acceptance measures and production responsibilities are recorded before implementation so both teams know what evidence will support release.
- Risk-based testing and acceptance measures
- Release, rollback, and observability responsibilities
- Security controls tied to the agreed threat model
- Handover artifacts defined in the signed scope
Want to scope this properly?
Need token development services? Share your tokenomics and we’ll outline scope and milestones. CAD-based engagements.
We’ll review the context and reply with a practical next step.