Softment
Web3NFT marketplaces, collections, art platforms

Technology

NFT Platforms

Build NFT platforms and marketplaces with clean UX, admin tooling, and wallet integrations—designed for practical operations and reliable releases.

Best For

Ideal use cases

NFT marketplace projects

Digital art platforms

Gaming NFT systems

Collectibles platforms

Applications requiring NFT functionality

What We Build

Projects we deliver

NFT marketplace platforms

NFT minting interfaces

Collection management systems

Auction and bidding systems

Royalty distribution systems

NFT discovery and search

Wallet integration

Metadata management

Ecosystem

Compatible tools & integrations

Seamless Integrations

Works with your existing stack

7+ supported
ERC-721 and ERC-1155 contracts
IPFS for metadata storage
OpenSea API or custom marketplace
Web3.js or Ethers.js
MetaMask for wallet integration
The Graph for indexing
Image processing and optimization

Use Cases

Recommended use cases

NFT marketplace platforms

Digital art and collectibles

Gaming NFT systems

Music and media NFT platforms

Brand loyalty programs with NFTs

Delivery

How we deliver

We develop NFT platforms with proper smart contract integration

Implement IPFS for decentralized metadata storage

Set up wallet connections and transaction handling

Create minting, listing, and trading interfaces

Implement proper royalty distribution

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

We can build custom marketplaces or integrate with OpenSea. Custom marketplaces offer more control and features. OpenSea integration provides existing user base but limited customization.

We use IPFS for decentralized metadata storage. We store images and metadata on IPFS, with fallback options. We can also use Arweave for permanent storage or hybrid approaches.

Yes. We can build NFT platforms supporting multiple blockchains like Ethereum, Polygon, and Solana. We implement wallet connections and contract interactions for each chain.

Regional

Delivery considerations for your region

Data and risk discovery (Canada)

Privacy, security, residency, and regulatory requirements differ by workflow. We document the applicable data flows, roles, retention needs, and control owners before recommending an architecture.

The resulting proposal lists the controls and evidence that are actually in scope. It is not a generic compliance, certification, or legal-assurance promise.

  • Map data sources, destinations, roles, and sensitive fields
  • Record access, retention, logging, and deletion requirements
  • Identify required security or procurement evidence before contracting
  • Use an NDA or DPA only when the parties mutually execute it

Working model (Canada)

Exact live-overlap hours, response expectations, meeting windows, and escalation contacts are confirmed in the proposal for each engagement.

Written decisions, scoped milestones, and asynchronous updates reduce unnecessary meetings without implying an unagreed service level.

  • Proposal-specific overlap and meeting windows
  • Named owners for decisions and blockers
  • Written scope, assumptions, and change decisions
  • Milestone cadence agreed before kickoff

Commercial setup (Canada)

The contracting entity, proposal currency, invoicing cadence, payment terms, intellectual-property terms, and required vendor documents are agreed before work begins.

The Opportunity Sprint can establish the evidence needed to scope a production pilot; it does not pre-commit either party to a rollout.

  • Contracting entity and currency confirmed in writing
  • Milestones and acceptance criteria defined in the proposal
  • Vendor-document requirements identified before signature
  • Scope changes require an explicit written decision

Delivery controls (Canada)

Testing, observability, release, security, and handover controls are selected for the actual system risk rather than promised as a generic bundle.

Acceptance measures and production responsibilities are recorded before implementation so both teams know what evidence will support release.

  • Risk-based testing and acceptance measures
  • Release, rollback, and observability responsibilities
  • Security controls tied to the agreed threat model
  • Handover artifacts defined in the signed scope
Ready to start?

Want to scope this properly?

Planning an NFT marketplace? Tell us your flows and we’ll propose an MVP roadmap with milestones. CAD-based engagements.

We’ll review the context and reply with a practical next step.