Technology
Next.js
Ship fast, SEO-ready web apps with Next.js—server rendering, routing, and performance patterns that hold up as your product scales.
Best For
Ideal use cases
Applications requiring SEO optimization
Projects needing server-side rendering
Full-stack applications with API routes
Content-heavy websites with static generation
Applications prioritizing performance
What We Build
Projects we deliver
Marketing websites with blog integration
E-commerce platforms with product pages
SaaS applications with dashboard and billing
Documentation sites with search
Landing pages with A/B testing
Multi-tenant applications
Progressive web applications
API endpoints alongside frontend
Ecosystem
Compatible tools & integrations
Seamless Integrations
Works with your existing stack
Use Cases
Recommended use cases
Startup MVPs needing fast development and deployment
E-commerce platforms requiring SEO
SaaS platforms with marketing site and app
Content sites with dynamic routing
Applications needing both static and dynamic pages
Delivery
How we deliver
We use Next.js App Router for new projects, Pages Router for migrations
Optimize images with next/image and implement ISR for dynamic content
Set up API routes for server-side logic and database queries
Implement proper metadata for SEO
Use middleware for authentication and routing logic
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Use Next.js when you need server-side rendering, SEO optimization, API routes, or optimized performance out of the box. Plain React is better for SPAs that don't need SEO or when you prefer more control over the build setup.
For new projects, we use App Router as it's the recommended approach. For existing projects or migrations, we may use Pages Router based on requirements. App Router offers better performance and developer experience.
We deploy Next.js apps on Vercel for optimal performance and zero-configuration deployment. We can also deploy on AWS, Google Cloud, or self-hosted servers using Docker.
AI
Add AI on top of this stack
Two common AI services that pair well with this technology, plus the evidence-first buyer sprint.
Regional
Delivery considerations for your region
Data and risk discovery (Australia)
Privacy, security, residency, and regulatory requirements differ by workflow. We document the applicable data flows, roles, retention needs, and control owners before recommending an architecture.
The resulting proposal lists the controls and evidence that are actually in scope. It is not a generic compliance, certification, or legal-assurance promise.
- Map data sources, destinations, roles, and sensitive fields
- Record access, retention, logging, and deletion requirements
- Identify required security or procurement evidence before contracting
- Use an NDA or DPA only when the parties mutually execute it
Working model (Australia)
Exact live-overlap hours, response expectations, meeting windows, and escalation contacts are confirmed in the proposal for each engagement.
Written decisions, scoped milestones, and asynchronous updates reduce unnecessary meetings without implying an unagreed service level.
- Proposal-specific overlap and meeting windows
- Named owners for decisions and blockers
- Written scope, assumptions, and change decisions
- Milestone cadence agreed before kickoff
Commercial setup (Australia)
The contracting entity, proposal currency, invoicing cadence, payment terms, intellectual-property terms, and required vendor documents are agreed before work begins.
The Opportunity Sprint can establish the evidence needed to scope a production pilot; it does not pre-commit either party to a rollout.
- Contracting entity and currency confirmed in writing
- Milestones and acceptance criteria defined in the proposal
- Vendor-document requirements identified before signature
- Scope changes require an explicit written decision
Delivery controls (Australia)
Testing, observability, release, security, and handover controls are selected for the actual system risk rather than promised as a generic bundle.
Acceptance measures and production responsibilities are recorded before implementation so both teams know what evidence will support release.
- Risk-based testing and acceptance measures
- Release, rollback, and observability responsibilities
- Security controls tied to the agreed threat model
- Handover artifacts defined in the signed scope
Want to scope this properly?
Planning a Next.js build? Share your requirements and we’ll map scope, architecture, and milestones. AUD-based engagements.
We’ll review the context and reply with a practical next step.