Case StudiesCareers
    AI Studio
    Chat with AI
    Web3Decision Guide

    ERC-20 vs ERC-721

    ERC-20 is for fungible tokens (currencies, points). ERC-721 is for non-fungible tokens (unique items, collectibles).

    Get Personalized EstimateChat with AI

    Quick Verdict

    Choose ERC-20 if...

    • You're creating a currency or utility token
    • All tokens should be interchangeable
    • You need divisible tokens
    • You're building loyalty points or governance tokens
    • High transaction volume is expected

    Choose ERC-721 if...

    • Each token represents a unique asset
    • You're creating digital art or collectibles
    • Items have individual properties/metadata
    • You need provable ownership of unique items
    • You're tokenizing real-world assets

    Side-by-Side Comparison

    Feature
    ERC-20
    ERC-721
    Fungibility
    Fungible (interchangeable)
    Non-fungible (unique)
    Divisibility
    Yes (decimals)
    No (whole tokens only)
    Token ID
    No (balance-based)
    Yes (each token has ID)
    Metadata
    Contract-level only
    Per-token metadata
    Transfer Cost
    Lower gas
    Higher gas
    Use Cases
    Currencies, governance
    Art, collectibles, assets
    Enumeration
    Not needed
    Optional extension
    Approvals
    Amount-based
    Per-token or operator
    Complexity
    Simpler
    More complex
    Marketplace Support
    DEXes
    NFT marketplaces

    Decision Checklist

    Ask yourself these questions to guide your decision:

    1Should tokens be interchangeable?
    2Does each token need unique properties?
    3Do you need fractional/divisible tokens?
    4Will tokens represent unique real-world items?
    5What marketplaces need to support your tokens?
    6How important is gas efficiency?
    7Do you need per-token metadata?
    8What is the expected transaction volume?

    Tradeoffs & Gotchas

    ERC-20 cannot represent unique items
    ERC-721 costs more gas per transfer
    ERC-20 is simpler to implement
    ERC-721 requires metadata management
    ERC-20 has better DeFi integration
    ERC-721 has better marketplace integration
    ERC-20 scales better for high volume
    ERC-721 enables richer ownership experiences

    Our Recommendation

    Pick ERC-20 for currencies and utility tokens
    Pick ERC-721 for unique digital collectibles
    Pick ERC-20 for governance tokens
    Pick ERC-721 for gaming items with unique stats
    Pick ERC-20 for reward points systems
    Pick ERC-721 for certificates or credentials

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Can I convert between ERC-20 and ERC-721?
    Not directly. They serve different purposes. You could create wrapping mechanisms, but it's usually not practical.
    Which is better for gaming?
    Often both. ERC-20 for in-game currency, ERC-721 for unique items. Consider ERC-1155 for games with both.
    Can ERC-721 tokens have different values?
    Yes. While each token is unique, marketplaces determine value based on metadata, rarity, and demand.
    Which is cheaper to deploy?
    ERC-20 contracts are typically simpler and cheaper to deploy. ERC-721 adds complexity for metadata and enumeration.

    Related Comparisons

    Backend

    Firebase vs Supabase

    Firebase is Google's mature BaaS with NoSQL. Supabase is the open-source alternative with PostgreSQL. Both reduce backend work significantly.

    Read more
    Web3

    Foundry vs Hardhat

    Hardhat is JavaScript-based with a large ecosystem. Foundry is Rust-based with faster tests. Both are production-ready.

    Read more
    Web3

    ERC-721 vs ERC-1155

    ERC-721 is the original NFT standard. ERC-1155 is a multi-token standard supporting both fungible and non-fungible tokens efficiently.

    Read more
    Ready to start?

    Need help deciding?

    Every project is different. Let us analyze your specific requirements and recommend the best approach.

    Get EstimateChat with AI