Technology
Vercel
Deploy Next.js on Vercel with a clean workflow—preview environments, caching, and performance tuning that keeps releases predictable.
Best For
Ideal use cases
Next.js and React applications
Static sites and JAMstack applications
Projects needing edge deployment
Applications prioritizing deployment speed
Teams wanting zero-configuration hosting
What We Build
Projects we deliver
Next.js applications
React single-page applications
Static marketing sites
JAMstack applications
API routes with Next.js
Serverless functions
Edge functions
Progressive web applications
Ecosystem
Compatible tools & integrations
Seamless Integrations
Works with your existing stack
Use Cases
Recommended use cases
Startup MVPs using Next.js
Marketing sites and landing pages
JAMstack applications
Frontend applications needing fast deployment
Projects with GitHub-based workflows
Delivery
How we deliver
We set up Vercel projects with proper environment variables and configuration
Use preview deployments for testing and staging
Configure custom domains and SSL certificates
Set up analytics and monitoring
Optimize builds and implement proper caching
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Vercel is optimized for Next.js and React applications with zero-configuration deployment, edge network, and automatic optimizations. AWS offers more flexibility but requires more setup.
Vercel supports Next.js API routes and serverless functions, suitable for lightweight backend logic. For complex backends, we recommend separate backend services on AWS or GCP.
We use serverless-friendly databases like PlanetScale, Supabase, or connection pooling services. We avoid persistent connections and use connection pooling for traditional databases.
AI
Add AI on top of this stack
Two common AI services that pair well with this technology, plus the evidence-first buyer sprint.
Regional
Delivery considerations for your region
Data and risk discovery (Canada)
Privacy, security, residency, and regulatory requirements differ by workflow. We document the applicable data flows, roles, retention needs, and control owners before recommending an architecture.
The resulting proposal lists the controls and evidence that are actually in scope. It is not a generic compliance, certification, or legal-assurance promise.
- Map data sources, destinations, roles, and sensitive fields
- Record access, retention, logging, and deletion requirements
- Identify required security or procurement evidence before contracting
- Use an NDA or DPA only when the parties mutually execute it
Working model (Canada)
Exact live-overlap hours, response expectations, meeting windows, and escalation contacts are confirmed in the proposal for each engagement.
Written decisions, scoped milestones, and asynchronous updates reduce unnecessary meetings without implying an unagreed service level.
- Proposal-specific overlap and meeting windows
- Named owners for decisions and blockers
- Written scope, assumptions, and change decisions
- Milestone cadence agreed before kickoff
Commercial setup (Canada)
The contracting entity, proposal currency, invoicing cadence, payment terms, intellectual-property terms, and required vendor documents are agreed before work begins.
The Opportunity Sprint can establish the evidence needed to scope a production pilot; it does not pre-commit either party to a rollout.
- Contracting entity and currency confirmed in writing
- Milestones and acceptance criteria defined in the proposal
- Vendor-document requirements identified before signature
- Scope changes require an explicit written decision
Delivery controls (Canada)
Testing, observability, release, security, and handover controls are selected for the actual system risk rather than promised as a generic bundle.
Acceptance measures and production responsibilities are recorded before implementation so both teams know what evidence will support release.
- Risk-based testing and acceptance measures
- Release, rollback, and observability responsibilities
- Security controls tied to the agreed threat model
- Handover artifacts defined in the signed scope
Want to scope this properly?
Want a Vercel setup with CA business-hours overlap? Share your repo and we’ll recommend the best deployment approach. CAD-based engagements.
We’ll review the context and reply with a practical next step.