Industries
Web3 & Blockchain
Solidity development company building smart contracts and Web3 products—test coverage, review discipline, and audit-ready handoff.
What We Build
Solutions we deliver
Solidity smart contracts (EVM chains)
Token and NFT contract systems
Web3 dApps with wallet auth and on-chain actions
Indexing and data sync layers
Admin tooling for ops and moderation
Security checks and audit prep workflows
DeFi dashboards and on-chain analytics
Backend APIs for hybrid Web2/Web3 products
Features
Common features
Solidity development services with clear test coverage
Threat modeling and security-first patterns
Audit-ready handoff (docs, tests, deployment notes)
Wallet integrations (WalletConnect, SIWE patterns where applicable)
Indexing strategy (subgraphs/ETL) for product UX
Transaction UX: retries, gas handling, and error states
Role management and admin controls
Monitoring and alerting for on-chain events
CI for contract tests and deployments
EVM chains + Polygon (Matic) support where needed
Solana support on request (scope-dependent)
Practical integration with web apps and backends
Requirements
Standards and controls to assess
These labels identify requirements that may be relevant to the product; they are not Softment certifications or a compliance guarantee. Exact legal obligations, control scope, and evidence are defined with the client's counsel and, where required, validated by an independent assessor.
Tech Stack
Recommended stack
Timeline
Typical timelines
Discovery
Requirements gathering and architecture design
Build
Development, testing, and iterative feedback
Launch
Deployment, optimization, and handoff
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
We build contracts with a security-first approach and can support audit prep (tests, docs, threat modeling). Formal audits should be done by an independent auditor when required.
We primarily ship on EVM chains (Ethereum-compatible) and can support Polygon (Matic). Solana support is possible on request depending on the scope and SDK requirements.
Yes. We build DeFi-oriented contracts and dashboards with careful security considerations, clear risk notes, and staged rollout plans.
We use test coverage, review discipline, staged deployments, and clear rollback/upgrade strategies (when applicable) to reduce risk before mainnet exposure.
Related
Explore related industries
Regional
Delivery considerations for your region
Data and risk discovery (United Kingdom)
Privacy, security, residency, and regulatory requirements differ by workflow. We document the applicable data flows, roles, retention needs, and control owners before recommending an architecture.
The resulting proposal lists the controls and evidence that are actually in scope. It is not a generic compliance, certification, or legal-assurance promise.
- Map data sources, destinations, roles, and sensitive fields
- Record access, retention, logging, and deletion requirements
- Identify required security or procurement evidence before contracting
- Use an NDA or DPA only when the parties mutually execute it
Working model (United Kingdom)
Exact live-overlap hours, response expectations, meeting windows, and escalation contacts are confirmed in the proposal for each engagement.
Written decisions, scoped milestones, and asynchronous updates reduce unnecessary meetings without implying an unagreed service level.
- Proposal-specific overlap and meeting windows
- Named owners for decisions and blockers
- Written scope, assumptions, and change decisions
- Milestone cadence agreed before kickoff
Commercial setup (United Kingdom)
The contracting entity, proposal currency, invoicing cadence, payment terms, intellectual-property terms, and required vendor documents are agreed before work begins.
The Opportunity Sprint can establish the evidence needed to scope a production pilot; it does not pre-commit either party to a rollout.
- Contracting entity and currency confirmed in writing
- Milestones and acceptance criteria defined in the proposal
- Vendor-document requirements identified before signature
- Scope changes require an explicit written decision
Delivery controls (United Kingdom)
Testing, observability, release, security, and handover controls are selected for the actual system risk rather than promised as a generic bundle.
Acceptance measures and production responsibilities are recorded before implementation so both teams know what evidence will support release.
- Risk-based testing and acceptance measures
- Release, rollback, and observability responsibilities
- Security controls tied to the agreed threat model
- Handover artifacts defined in the signed scope
Shipping a Web3 product with real users?
Share the chain, contract scope, and integration needs—we’ll propose a security-first plan with milestones and clear risk notes.
Scoped around your requirements. No-pressure consultation.